Curriculum Specialist Product of Learning Rubric

  Criteria

0

Does Not Meet Standard

1

Meets Standard

2

Target
  Portfolio Elements Standard does not have accompanying rationale-reflection and/or artifact(s) do not address the standards. Rationale-reflection is present and crafted to justify the selection and value of artifacts. Artifacts reflect standard-specific teacher knowledge, dispositions, and performances. Rationale-reflection provides insightful, in-depth support to justify the selection and value of artifacts. All standards are clearly and thoroughly addressed and supported with multiple examples reflecting advanced teacher knowledge, dispositions, and performances.

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s

Professional Information

      

Learner
(Learner may refer to public school students or adult learners such as teachers, administrators, etc.)

      

Curriculum
(Artifacts that support knowledge of local, state, and national curricular influences, theory, development, assessment, etc. are appropriate.)

      

Content Knowledge
(Content knowledge may include a teaching field, knowledge of curriculum at the local, state, and national levels, federal legislation, state mandates, implications for classroom teachers, etc.)

      

Instruction
(Instruction may include documentation of classroom-based activities with student/learner work samples and/or training programs with adult learners.)

      

Schooling
(Schooling may include organizational patterns, philosophy, trends and issues.  The planning, implementation, and assessment of curriculum in various levels and types of schools may be appropriate in this section.)

     

Leadership
(Leadership should include examples of participation in professional development, leadership in organizations, internship accomplishments, etc.)

      

Working Successfully with Family and Community Members
(Documented success at working with stakeholders outside the classroom is appropriate for this section.)

      

Research
(Action research projects, examples of use of research base in professional practice, etc. should be included here.)

      

Assessment
(Artifacts should show the curriculum specialists’ knowledge of curriculum assessment and implications for practitioners and leaders.)

      

 

Part Two: POL Presentation

 Criteria

0
Does Not Meet Standard

1
Meets Standard

2
Target

 Comments

Organization

The POL lacks order and/or logic.

The POL is adequate with good organization and a logical sequence.

The POL is exceptional with appropriate accompanying documentation.

 

Presentation

Articulated beliefs are not consistent with the curriculum specialist program standards.

The candidate articulates a basic conceptual and applicable understanding of the curriculum specialist program standards.

The candidate demonstrates a comprehensive conceptual and applicable understanding of the curriculum specialist program standards.

 

Final Reflection

No final reflection of the degree program.

Final reflection of degree program is present.

Final reflection of the program is in-depth and supports the curriculum specialist program standards.

 

Total Points

 

 

 

 

Date: ____________________________________

Overall Assessment/Comments:

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____Does Not Meet Standard                                   _____Meets Standard  (13-18 points)              _____Target (19-26 points)
(resubmit materials for areas scoring 0)                                            (minimum of one point for each criterion)

Total Points Earned (26 possible) ____________